TLDR; If you don’t want to read the whole article, at least read the solution at the bottom!
Since the 1990s, the voting system has become an impossible to verify process. Inch by inch they have taken miles of integrity out of the voting system. The two main cornerstones to quality election have always be anonymity of the vote (secrecy) and integrity (accuracy). The integrity was taken first, by electronic voting machines and mail-in ballots. The long standing rule of chain of custody required every step of the process to have two people signing and vouching for the integrity of each step of the process. The secrecy is often used as excuses to sacrifice integrity. Recently Washington state started printing Republican and Democrat checkboxes on the outside of the mail-in ballots to make sure people don’t vote for different parties at different stages of the voting process. So now your party, address, phone and signature are all available for anyone to see as your ballot makes its way through the mail on its way to the central vote tabulation location. I once called a person to tell them that their signature name and address was on a news site talking about the security of voting that showed a pile of envelopes with all that personal information for everyone to see.
Electronic Voting Machines
It was proven in the 1990s with the demonstration of the Hursti Hack that electronic voting machines could have their results altered without ever touching the voting machines on election night or the days that followed. It was an intentional flaw added to a proprietary product where only the manufacturer knows the code that manipulates the votes. This breaks the chain of custody rule. The Hursti Hack exposed the clever way the vote outcomes were intentionally altered. At the start of the vote, the group running the elections would verity ‘all zeros’ as the totals from all candidates were added together and a zero result was displayed. To the election officials, it appeared that there were no current votes and that zero totals were used for the starting point. Rather than check each candidate/issue for a zero, they were all added together first and that result was printed. If candidate A started with 10,000 votes and candidate B started with -10,000 votes, they would show as a zero start. After the election, the results were tabulated and candidate A would have a lead of 20,000 votes if the actual vote was in reality a tie. This was proven on Diebold voting machines.
In the 2004 General election in Washington state Sequoia voting machines were used and the results were very unexpected. Overwhelmingly people appeared to vote for George W. Bush and at the same time a series of very liberal issues (gay marriage and legalizing marijuana). A lawsuit was filed and as a result they removed the electronic voting machines and replaced them with mail-in ballots. The results of the election remained unchanged.
Mail in Ballots
Mail in ballots have broken the chain of custody by introducing the postal service and many steps of the process that lack two signatures and people vouching for the integrity of the process. Do you trust the postal service? Would you mail $1,000 in cash to a friend without any hesitation? Integrity in voting isn’t about ‘probably being safe’ but proving that it can’t possibly be altered.
Robert Malone MD just recently wrote an excellent article about Censorship and the Criminalization of Election Integrity.
Identification required to vote
There is a lot of discussion about requiring ID to vote. People use excuses like ID is racist or an invasion of privacy, but none of these are real arguments. There is no good reason not to force people to identify themselves to vote. If you don’t, all of the known fraud methods become possible (dead people voting, stuffing ballot boxes, destroying cases of ballots, etc.)
The perfect voting solution
The best way to hold an election is to vote in person at your local precinct with a paper ballot that is hand counted at the end of the night while everyone watches. Precincts can be small, the counting can occur very fast and the results can be posted on the wall like test scores for all to see. Audits are easy. Local precincts send their totals to a central county tabulation site where everyone can see the same totals as were posted on their walls. Results are posted on a county website for everyone to see and match with their precinct. National totals are drawn from county totals. Total integrity, instant results. Extremely simple. No fraud possible. Very inexpensive.
For some reason the people who were elected by the current system don’t want to change the way the system works. They want to be in control of their own reelection process and don’t want to hand it off to the voters (they don’t trust them?). They have told me it is ‘too many points to control’.
The solution!
There is a very simple solution. We have been ushered into a world where voting can’t be verified but the banks can identify every persons every transaction without fail. We live in a time when parties are so polarized that members of each party think the entire other half of the voters have completely lost their minds. Both sides are making claims that they will leave the country if the other side wins. Both sides have been fed lies about the other side by the media. It is a rare time when each side is so motivated that they will do anything to win. They fear being forced to live in the reality in which they were told the other side lives. A disputed election will very likely create violence between both sides giving the ‘elected class’ an excuse to rush in and ‘fix’ things.
So how do we know the real vote? How do we prove it beyond any possible doubt? How do we fund such an operation when the ‘elected class’ wants to investigate it themselves to assure an outcome that benefits themselves.
Here is the plan: Create a go-fund-me or similar account for each candidate. Tell people that to assure the vote was accurate, they need to deposit $1 or more in the respective account for their favored candidate. Tell them that the other side is trying to steal the election. There are about 200 million voters nationally, each easily able to afford $1 to get accuracy and prove the outcome. That is $200 million to litigate the election to the point where the outcome is known. Can’t audit the election system because of lost chain-of-custody reasons? Good, because everyone just voted using their $1 and that system does have chain-of-custody. In fact, people could use $5 to vote if they want, but it is only their act of contributing that is used for a vote, not the amount. More money means a bigger chunk of cash to fix things. Let’s assume that on average people each chip in $5 for their vote. That makes about $1B to take our country back! In my county, the voter roles are public so if anyone wants to take the time to match up names and donations for errors they can. This could clear up the voter roles if nothing else. This can happen before or after the election day has passed. What person would vote for Harris and contribute to the Trump fund or visa versa?
Recently under the excuse of eliminating terrorism and fraud, the banking industry has forced people to identify bank accounts back to a person. You can’t have two paypal accounts unless they are linked to a single identity. Corporate funds are marked separate in the banking industry so businesses could contribute, but their vote would not count.
What if the ‘elected class’ claims that this is illegal for voting? Call it a class action lawsuit that is pre-funded. It can be argued in court that the bank accounts have spoken and they want justice. The people will have spoken and they won’t be able to resist.
So you have proven the vote with just the donations. Now what do you do with the remaining funds? The problem that caused all of this was a captured media. Only a few families own all the major media sources. Use the money to sue CNN for false stories and then buy CNN and return it to the people. Call it PBS 2.0 or NPR 2.0. They are installed in every airport and many other public venues. Since then their ratings have slipped significantly. The lies and deception has cost them severely but some people still watch them. The very people that need an education and who won’t believe anything until they see it on TV. You would take the worst offender of information and turn it into a messenger of truth. No longer required to appease the share holders but instead provide real news. Some advertisers would pull their adds (big pharma for sure) and the adds that replace them will be quality companies that are good for the country.
CNN is just one idea of what you could do with a billion dollar fund. Fixing the media is in my mind the most effective way to hold our political system responsible. It used to be that politics was tried in the media. Today, as proven in Missouri vs Biden, our federal government is controlling the media and uses ‘fact checkers’ to discredit truths about the government.
Ensuring accurate news
There are ways to guarantee news is accurate and it isn’t censorship and ‘fact checkers’. It is public debate like you see on substack. In many of my substack feeds the authors join in on the discussion about their articles. The truth will always come out if it is allowed. There is a reason why none of the fact checkers allow any comments on their page; they don’t want any discussion or criticism.
Censorship causes three injustices:
1) It prohibits the speaker from having a voice.
2) It prohibits the listener from hearing a new idea.
3) It prohibits a liar from being exposed as an idiot.
When news sources don’t allow public comments on their articles they don’t allow their articles to be vetted as true. Like scientific publish journals, ideas need to flow free and be either confirmed or disproven. That is how we as a society become great. We are being robbed of our greatness.
The expected response
The ‘elected class’ wants division and violence. They set this up by bypassing the primaries for Harris and appointed a candidate that was not selected by the people. This was not an accident or unfortunate sequence of natural events that were unexpected. This was a plan to play the system and appoint someone who was already under their control and very unpopular with the people.
Trump is in my opinion controlled opposition. He was put in office to be a punching bag and create so much hate in democrats and hope in republicans as well as occupy the Republican slot so they could run whoever they want in the Democrat slot and people would vote for them. In my opinion, the best choice between the two, if you consider both are puppets of the deep state, is the one who is supposed to pretend to be against them.
Even if you believe that Trump isn’t a plant, but our savior and ‘this time will be different’, the best choice of action is the same. Choose Trump over Harris, take back the vote and return honesty to the media.
Implementing the plan
What this idea needs to succeed as a grass roots movement is to go viral with certain key people who can give the idea exposure. I tried several times to contact Elon Musk. I even sent a message to the board of directors of Tesla but never got a response. Matt Taibbi is an amazing journalist for reporting like the Twitter Files and other excellent articles, Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan have been great for hosting so many good interviews. There are many others that I respect as well, but they don’t respond to comments on their substacks. I respect them all for the journalists that they are but they are impossible to contact and get a response. Robert Malone MD is one substack author that does respond in his comments section and that says something great about him. He is willing to have a conversation and discuss things and that makes him a better author. If enough of us push the idea to that level, I am certain that it will take roots.
Trumps Victory and what to expect
A lot of people are excited about what Trumps win means. No more of the same Biden totalitarian rule. A new direction for America. Make America Healthy Again. While I would like to believe all of these expectations that we were told will happen, I am skeptical. The forces that have controlled our elections, the media and our lives for the past decade do not just get voted out. Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Tech don’t just change because the party changed from D to R. You don’t vote your way out of tyranny. I remain hopefully optimistic, but we all have to be real about the psyops that have been going on for at least a decade now and too many people are in control of everything that happens. If they didn’t want Trump elected the first time, or this time, it would not have happened. I really hope that he at least makes it to election day without getting jailed, Epsteined, exiled (like Venezuela) or any other method that could change the direction in the next few months before inauguration day. Get your popcorn because the next few months are going to be entertaining.
the biggest problem with mail-in voting that I have yet to see discussed at all: it eliminates secret ballots within families. I say this as an Oregon resident who personally filled in and returned the ballots of two grown kids who moved away from the State 3 years ago. They are oblivious (and I have not asked if they are now registered in Texas or New York - I don't think my son even knows he was ever registered in Oregon, as everyone who applies for a driver's license gets a ballot mailed to them in perpetuity to the address on that original license, even after it expires. (Another irony, I can't vote in Oregon myself as I continually renew my Texas DL from 10 years ago.)