Who are 'They'?
The 'who' is harder to answer than the 'what' when it comes to current psyops and worldwide control.
I count no less than 9 active psyops that are being played on the people. Not everyone sees these for what they are. Some see only a few of them. When you try to have a conversation about one of these psyops, the discussion will likely say ‘they’ are controlling the media or ‘they are lying about Climate Change. This can be a trigger for many people who have accepted the official narrative. “Who is ‘They’” the person will ask. The reason ‘they’ is used is because while it is easy to see and understand the narrative and all the holes in it, it is very difficult to pin down exactly where it is coming from. Who is controlling the narrative? Who is pulling the strings? Without the answer to this question it is difficult for a novice to understand how the narrative is wrong and why this is nothing but a conspiracy theory. Noam Chomsky explained it well in the following quote:
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum. - Noam Chomsky
For people who believe the current psyops, the only answer they can accept must fit within the narrow spectrum of acceptable debate. If it doesn’t, they don’t have any basis in their reality to accept this new idea. As a result, it is simply a conspiracy theory and you are one of those crazy people for suggesting that what ‘everyone knows’ is wrong.
Psyop example - Climate Change
Take for example, Climate Change. Most of us agree that the climate is different that when we were younger. That is not the debate. Psyops are always rooted in some truth. If you ask most people what the most dangerous pollution on earth is today, they will say CO2 (Carbon dioxide). Not any other of the many toxins released from dirty industries. CO2 and ‘Carbon Tax’ heads the list of the most evil thing threatening our existence. They claim that to be ‘green’ we must reduce CO2. When we breathe in oxygen, we breathe out CO2, CO2 accounts for 0.04% of our atmosphere. The claim is that if it raises to 0.06% all life on earth will face an existential threat. CO2 is what plants and trees need to breath and survive. If it drops to 0.02% plants will suffer. The con is that reducing CO2 will produce a ‘greener’ earth.
CO2, while classified as a greenhouse gas, is not the most prevalent or the most damaging.1 Water vapor is by far the most prevalent and as temperatures go up, so does cloud cover causing a regulating effect. Higher temperatures lead to more clouds and storms which lead to cooling the earth. Water vapor is the regulator that keeps the earths temperature in check. This fact is conveniently ignored in the climate change debate as well as Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” which was the start of the whole Climate Change movement.2 Gore promised in 5 years that (in 2006) that we would have major ice sheets melt and global sea levels that rise by approximately 20 feet. I believed it at the time and argued with any deniers in support of the concept. Gore won a Nobel prize for that speech (acting?) but none of what he claimed would happen, has happened.
With Climate Change, the only approved narrative is to either agree that CO2 is dangerous and we must eliminate as much of it as we can or you are labeled a climate denier. Once labeled as a denier, anything else you say will be discredited because you clearly can’t see the weather changes are happening. Accepting the obvious part of the climate change narrative requires believing the rest of the story. “Trust the science” they will say. All it takes is a scientist on TV or at a University to make this claim without any dissenting view and every non-scientist believes them.
If an expert challenges the narrative they will be silenced. No one is allowed to hear this differing opinion and the approved narrative will be repeated. This is what is common with all these psyops; censorship and repeating the false narrative over and over. Fact Checkers will chime in as ‘experts’ with a carefully crafted story often attacking the opponent’s credibility and repeating the lie that ‘everyone knows’. None of the fact check articles allow any discussion by anyone, not even experts in the field. They can’t be challenged. They must be accepted as arbiters of truth that the social media companies have appointed for your protection.
Now that we understand how people are misled and what method is used to accomplish this, the question remains: “Who is controlling the narrative?”. From the typical citizens point of view, this is just the natural process of a national or global conversation with all the available experts in the world. There doesn’t appear to be anyone controlling it.
The news media is owned by just a handful of corporations. One story or policy will hit each of the networks with very little variation. It may get a Republican spin or a Democratic spin, but any narrative conflicting stories will be published by mainstream media and other stories with a narrow approved narrative will get repeated over and over. Social media promotes certain stories and demotes or blocks others. Fact Checkers label articles that contradict the official narrative so most people assume they are false or never see them.
The Twitter Files proved that the FBI has at the direction of the White House controlled social media posts at draconian levels. The FBI admitted they paid and coerced social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to ban stories that they knew were true but that disagreed with the Biden administrations official narrative. Social media office workers who had no training in the medical field were blocking and banning expert doctors in their field who spoke truth against the official narrative. Missouri vs Biden3 proved that this was going on in a court of law and the ruling from the courts was that they needed to stop doing this though. Social media companies like Facebook are still censoring today despite that order.
Another Psyop example - Israel/Palestine
Currently we are faced with the narrative of supporting Palestine or Israel. Each has people who have done atrocities in the name of religion, race and land. Not too different than Hitler when you look at Israels motives (Gods favorites, entitled to your land, genocide). The only narrative allowed is who should exterminate who due to their evil. Viewing only from one perspective makes it easy to get behind that conclusion. This doesn’t take into account who did the acts, but who is guilty by association. If Hamas is guilty, then all of Palestine and for some, Iran, must die because some people in Iran cheered it on. If Israel is guilty, then all Jews must die regardless of where they live or what they think of Israel. The US, Canada and UK recently blocked any peace discussions requested by the other countries. You are labeled as Anti-semitic if you don’t agree with indiscriminate killing of ‘the other side’ even though both sides are Semites.
Thinking outside the accepted bounds of discussion we see that both sides can be wrong. We can realize that more killing is only going to lead to more killing as a response. That thinking will be met with ‘so you want to let the evil doers off the hook and let them break another treaty?’. Again, these people are only thinking within the approved narrative and repeating answers they were told in the last news cycle. Stop giving money to both sides. Stop giving Israel $10 Million per day for their military while they have free health care and the US does not. Try the appropriate people for war crimes (Nuremberg 2.0). Anyone that retaliates would be hunted down and held for trial. This becomes much easier if the governments on both sides are looking for evil within their own borders. If the citizens own governments won’t do this, they don’t represent their own citizens and they need to go.
When a government that opposes another government sends bombs, it doesn’t kill the other government, it kills the citizens of that country. In the case of Israel bombing Hamas, they are not killing Hamas, they are killing Palestinian citizens while Hamas hides in tunnels. Then of course, Hamas will attack again, not killing the government that sent the bombs, but Israeli citizens. This cycle continues until there are no citizens left, only some of the evil that started the madness in the first place remains.
There is a quote from the TV series M.A.S.H. about war being hell:
Hawkeye: War isn’t Hell. War is war, and Hell is Hell. And of the two, war is a lot worse.
Father Mulcahy: How do you figure that, Hawkeye?
Hawkeye: Easy, Father. Tell me, who goes to Hell?
Father Mulcahy: Sinners, I believe.
Hawkeye: Exactly. There are no innocent bystanders in Hell. War is chock full of them — little kids, cripples, old ladies. In fact, except for some of the brass, almost everybody involved is an innocent bystander.
———-
“Brass” - Now known as oligarchs.
Who is controlling the narrative?
The answer to Who is controlling the narrative could be the Biden administration, but it isn’t quite that simple. Other governments like the UK and Canada are doing the same thing at the same time. Is Biden controlling them as well? Not likely. It is much more likely that there are people controlling Biden, Trudeau and leaders of many other countries. When we look at the actions of the Biden administration, we see them being controlled by Pharma, Military Complex, and others. So it appears that corporations are controlling our government. That doesn’t come as a surprise. We have known about lobbyists for a long time now. We know that Senators and Representatives cater to corporations because they create jobs for their constituents, the citizens. The bigger the corporation the greater the influence on federal governments. Campaign donations and superPACs carry a big influence on elected officials as well. The revolving door gives promise of a cushy private sector job when a Senator or Representative is finished with their time in office. To expect anything other than mega corporations controlling our government would be baseless and naive.
Now we need to look at who controls the major corporations. Surely each egotistical CEO thinks in their own best interest. Why would they conspire to work with other businesses especially their competition? The requirement of the CEO and board members of a publicly traded corporation are to ensure the profits of the shareholders. They add another 10% to their Billion dollar bottom line and they are worth a multi million salary easy. In fact, if they don’t do the most to increase the bottom line, they could be fired or arrested for not doing their duty. Even when what they do is marginally legal and totally immoral, it is their requirement to do it… For profit. For the good of the company and its investors.
In addition to the bottom line, in order to be profitable, corporations need money and share holders. If they are not ‘cash rich’ and instead leveraged on money to grow and expand as they need to do, they are beholden to people who can provide these opportunities. A large investor in a corporation carries a large influence with the actions of the corporation. The bigger the stake in shares, the bigger the control with the threat of pulling out and destroying the corporations value and possibly existence.
So money rules all. It dictates the actions of major corporations who in turn control governments around the world. Who owns the most shares of the most corporations in the world? That is the company that would indirectly control the world. Blackrock is that company. Blackrock is the worlds largest asset manager with close to $10 Trillion in assets. They operate globally with 70 offices in 30 countries. They have close ties with the Federal Reserve and serve as advisors to it. They own significant shares in Media companies, Military contractors, Pharma businesses, fossil fuel companies and many more. They have the exclusive contract for the reconstruction of Ukraine profiting from war in both the destruction and reconstruction phases and using its control on government and the media to assure it continues to happen. More war means a stronger Blackrock.
Does it go any higher than this? Is there some organization of corporations that has an intent on controlling the world that has already set an agenda for the future? Yes there is. They are the World Economic Forum (WEF). A group of un-elected self appointed people who have a plan for one world government. The WEF sponsored a simulated pandemic in 2019 called Event 2014 where they practiced the handling of a fictitious pandemic involving Ebola, Zika, MERS and SARS. Months later the lab engineered Covid SARS virus was released on the world and we entered lockdowns and economic ruin for many while the large corporations profits soared. The founder and leader of the WEF, Klaus Schwab released a book on July 9, 2020 titled “The Great Reset”5 where he shares his vision of rebuilding the world into something different than what he had 10 years ago. He discusses not letting the pandemic go to waste:
Page 142 of 281 - Enlightened leadership. Some leaders and decision-makers who were already at the forefront of the fight against climate change may want to take advantage of the shock inflicted by the pandemic to implement long-lasting and wider environmental changes. They will, in effect, make “good use” of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste. The exhortation of different leaders ranging from HRH the prince of Wales to Andrew Cuomo to “build it back better” goes in that direction.
Schwab makes his case for one global government by saying:
Page 105 of 281 - The trilemma suggests that the three notions of economic globalization, political democracy and the nation state are mutually irreconcilable, based on the logic that only two can effectively co-exist at any given time.
In other words in order for his vision to succeed (globalization), we must give up political democracy or the nation state. To justify this, he argues that to control the borders during a pandemic are reasons to favor globalization. Saying it a different way, his globalization argument required a pandemic in order for this change to occur. A pandemic similar to the one that his organization practiced only months before.
It should be clear now who ‘They’ are and why it is difficult to claim it is one person or people controlling the world. There are layers upon layers of captured individuals. It should also be clear that with a news media that never addresses cases like Missouri vs Biden or talks about the WEF, how it is difficult for any loyal news watcher to understand what is going on and as a result, just dismiss it as a ‘conspiracy theory’.
This is all being done in plain sight. It can be verified easily. The only reason it is succeeding is that most people don’t make the effort to be informed on what they may be missing. All it takes is ‘thinking outside the box’ (accepted narrative).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Inconvenient_Truth
https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/10/live-simulation-exercise-to-prepare-public-and-private-leaders-for-pandemic-response
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08CRZ9VZB/ref=docs-os-doi_0